The State of the eReader Market: Apple Tablet vs. Kindle vs. Sony Reader
7:49 PM, Aug 25th, 2009 
2 Comments
Who will be the king of the eReader hill?
Right now there are two main contenders with the Amazonian giant standing upon the eReader hill with Sony playing the part of a young Sir Edmund Hillary. But what will happen once the Apple tablet comes out next year? Will people still feel the need for a cheaper dedicated reader or drink the Apple-flavored Kool-Aid and buy a more expensive table with multiple function?
Who knows? It’s fun to speculate though. Which is exactly what Jeff Bertolucci did in this post from PC World.
See the story after the jump.
Will Apple’s Mystery Tablet Join the E-reader Fray?
Will Apple Mystery Tablet Join E-reader Fray? If Apple’s mythical tablet is real-and given the spate of rumors from multiple sources, it certainly appears to be-the device could be a natural born book reader, ready to compete with Amazon, Sony, and soon Barnes & Noble in the burgeoning e-book market.
In fact, “compete” may be too soft a term. Apple could easily clean its opponents’ clock. It could quickly dominate e-books much as it conquered e-music with the launch of iTunes in 2003.
This is a concept image of a Mac tablet by MacFormat and is illustrated by Adam Benton.
Yes, it’s time for a boilerplate caveat. This is sheer speculation. My assumptions are based on what we’ve heard about the Apple tablet, and on what many users see as shortcomings of the Amazon and Sony e-readers.First off, let’s assume the tablet-or at least the larger version of it-has a 10-inch backlit display, wireless broadband, a touchscreen, and a Web browser. If so, it would provide a better ergonomic experience than the Amazon Kindle 2, which lacks backlighting and a touchscreen. Let’s also assume the tablet’s displa y will have a higher screen resolution than the Kindle’s 600 x 800 pixels, and that it’ll do a better job of managing PDF files. Add it all up, and the tablet is a better user experience, excluding battery life. It’s highly unlikely that Apple’s multifunction device would outlast the Amazon or Kindle reader in that competition.
What about the Kindle DX, Amazon’s larger e-reader with a 9.7-inch display? It suffers from many of the Kindle 2’s shortcomings, and seems more like a niche player destined for the education/textbook market.
And the Sony Reader? Well, it’s improving rapidly. The Reader Touch Edition has a 6-inch touchscreen; the Reader Daily Edition has AT&T’s 3G mobile broadband. But like the Kindle, the Reader is essentially a single-use appliance. And with prices ranging from $200 to $400, it’s a fairly expensive one at that. While reports indicate the Apple tablet may cost more-probably in the $600 to $800 range-it’ll do a lot more too, perhaps even double as a notebook PC.
Apple has one big edge over Sony: Its iTunes store is an established online marketplace that already sells music, movies, TV shows, and, of course, iPhone apps. Cupertino doesn’t have to reinvent the wheel to add e-books to its online retail mix. (Amazon, of course, is no slouch when it comes to online retailing either.)
To me, Apple’s biggest advantage in the e-book reader market would be the versatility of its tablet. Given a choice between an Apple tablet as described above, a Kindle 2, and a Sony Reader Daily Edition (the one with built-in 3G), I’d be willing to pay a little more for the tablet.
Will Apple enter the e-book market? We may find out as early as next month.
About the Author
You forgot the importance of the paper like display. People are already getting used to it, and will they go back to reading on a computer screen that cant read in sunlight and doesnt have the 2 week battery life of a kindle. Doubtful.
There are a few posts that better summarize our position on E-Ink displays better than this one, but we do think E-Ink screens are on their way out. There aren’t only ePaper displays and LCD screens anymore. New tech has made it possible to experience the best of both worlds (like the Pixel Qi which can switch between the two) or new way displays entirely (like Qualcomm’s Mirasol display tech which provides color and long battery life that rivals ePaper displays). Which choices like those why would people still stick to E-Ink screens when reflective color options are available that consume the same amount of power?
We certainly understand the argument of reflective ePaper displays versus emmitive LCD screens and can see the point there, but better stuff is a-comin’!